[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72751399-3170-059b-b572-b9b9986ca0fd@ghiti.fr>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 04:18:02 -0400
From: Alex Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64, mm: Move generic mmap layout functions to mm
On 3/22/19 9:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> It then introduces a new define ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
>> that can be defined by other architectures to benefit from those functions.
> Can you make this a Kconfig option defined in arch/Kconfig or mm/Kconfig
> and selected by the architectures?
Yes, I will do.
>> -#ifndef STACK_RND_MASK
>> -#define STACK_RND_MASK (0x7ff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12)) /* 8MB of VA */
>> -#endif
>> -
>> -static unsigned long randomize_stack_top(unsigned long stack_top)
>> -{
>> - unsigned long random_variable = 0;
>> -
>> - if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) {
>> - random_variable = get_random_long();
>> - random_variable &= STACK_RND_MASK;
>> - random_variable <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - }
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
>> - return PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top) + random_variable;
>> -#else
>> - return PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top) - random_variable;
>> -#endif
>> -}
>> -
> Maybe the move of this function can be split into another prep patch,
> as it is only very lightly related?
>
>
Ok, that makes sense.
>> +#if defined(HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT) || \
>> + defined(ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT)
> Not sure if it is wrіtten down somehwere or just convention, but I
> general see cpp defined statements aligned with spaces to the
> one on the previous line.
Ok, I will fix that.
> Except for these nitpicks this looks very nice to me, thanks for doing
> this work!
Thanks :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists