lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190323092640.Horde.2lm4u26aZox5ialxuIRcYw2@messagerie.si.c-s.fr>
Date:   Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:26:40 +0100
From:   LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler: allow all arches to enable
 CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> a écrit :

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:41 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>> I've added your patch to my randconfig test setup and will let you
>> know if I see anything noticeable. I'm currently testing clang-arm32,
>> clang-arm64 and gcc-x86.
>
> This is the only additional bug that has come up so far:
>
> `.exit.text' referenced in section `.alt.smp.init' of
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o: defined in discarded section
> `exit.text' of drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o

Wouldn't it be useful to activate -Winline gcc warning to ease finding  
out problematic usage of inline keyword ?

Christophe

>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h
> index 201100226301..84b12e33104d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags);
>  const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer,
>         unsigned int machine_nr);
>  #else
> -static inline const struct machine_desc *
> +static __always_inline const struct machine_desc *
>  setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr)
>  {
>         early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n");


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ