[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a642196-4c6c-9efe-946b-9d6ecf33c9e3@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:59:34 +0000
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: jeremy.linton@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
dave.martin@....com, shankerd@...eaurora.org,
julien.thierry@....com, mlangsdo@...hat.com, stefan.wahren@....com,
andre.przywara@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stefan.wahren@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] arm64: Advertise mitigation of Spectre-v2, or
lack thereof
On 21/03/2019 23:05, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>
> We currently have a list of CPUs affected by Spectre-v2, for which
> we check that the firmware implements ARCH_WORKAROUND_1. It turns
> out that not all firmwares do implement the required mitigation,
> and that we fail to let the user know about it.
>
> Instead, let's slightly revamp our checks, and rely on a whitelist
> of cores that are known to be non-vulnerable, and let the user know
> the status of the mitigation in the kernel log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> [This makes more sense in front of the sysfs patch]
> [Pick pieces of that patch into this and move it earlier]
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists