[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190325145023.GG9924@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:50:23 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support
On Mon 25-03-19 10:28:00, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> writes:
>
> >> > and I would like to know that you are
> >> > not just shifting the problem to a smaller unit and a new/creative HW
> >> > will force us to go even more complicated.
> >>
> >> HW will not do this to us. It's software that has the problem.
> >> Namespace creation is unnecessarily constrained to 128MB alignment.
> >
> > And why is that a problem? A lack of documentation that this is a
> > requirement? Something will not work with a larger alignment? Someting
> > else?
>
> See this email for one user-visible problem:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/x49imxbx22d.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com/
: # ndctl create-namespace -m fsdax -s 128m
: Error: '--size=' must align to interleave-width: 6 and alignment: 2097152
: did you intend --size=132M?
:
: failed to create namespace: Invalid argument
So the size is in section size units. So what prevents the userspace to
use a proper alignment? I am sorry if this is a stupid question but I am
not really familiar with ndctl nor the pmem side of it.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists