[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x494l7rdo5r.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:28:00 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> writes:
>> > and I would like to know that you are
>> > not just shifting the problem to a smaller unit and a new/creative HW
>> > will force us to go even more complicated.
>>
>> HW will not do this to us. It's software that has the problem.
>> Namespace creation is unnecessarily constrained to 128MB alignment.
>
> And why is that a problem? A lack of documentation that this is a
> requirement? Something will not work with a larger alignment? Someting
> else?
See this email for one user-visible problem:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/x49imxbx22d.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com/
Cheers,
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists