[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903261817370.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:24:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] x86/speculation: Fix __initconst in bugs.c
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, Andi Kleen wrote:
Finally found a fix in the pile of unrelated crap.
Subject: x86/speculation: Fix __initconst in bugs.c
So how does this fix __initconst?
Again from Documentation:
"The summary phrase in the email’s Subject should concisely describe the
patch which that email contains. The summary phrase should not be a
filename."
Also instead of having the file name in the subject line, which is
completely uninteresting the prefix should be 'x86/cpu/bugs:'
> Fix some of the recently added const tables to use __initconst
> for const data instead of __initdata which causes section attribute
> conflicts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
This lacks a 'Fixes:' tag.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists