lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJVBTny7kzADSZHQXk_ZUjnRaNWu0Ly3WC8v+zPmR8Dizg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:51:41 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: davinci: fix cpufreq registration on da850-evm

wt., 26 mar 2019 o 15:00 Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> napisaƂ(a):
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:31 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > The system_rev variable is never set on davinci and is always 0, so
> > we're using the default max operating point of 300MHz. The cvdd supply
> > comes from the tps6507 pmic and the voltage can go all the way to 1.3V
> > so the maximum supported rate should be 456MHz.
>
> My understanding is that only certain revisions of the silicon can go
> to 456MHz.   The L138's Datasheet lists both a 456 and 375 version.  I
> cannot find a way to read a register to determine which version of the
> silicon is available. Maybe Sekhar can confirm.
>

Commit 28bd2c341120 ("davinci: am18x/da850/omap-l138 evm: add support
for higher speed grades") mentions the following:

---
U-Boot on the EVM sets up ATAG_REVISION to inform the OS
regarding the speed grade supported by the silicon. We use
this information to pass on the speed grade information to
the SoC code.
---

Should the system_rev somehow reflect that revision? Any way I can check it?

Bart

> adam
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 12 +-----------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> > index 1fdc9283a8c5..58b2a485b527 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> > @@ -1155,17 +1155,7 @@ static struct edma_rsv_info *da850_edma_rsv[2] = {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> >  static __init int da850_evm_init_cpufreq(void)
> >  {
> > -       switch (system_rev & 0xF) {
> > -       case 3:
> > -               da850_max_speed = 456000;
> > -               break;
> > -       case 2:
> > -               da850_max_speed = 408000;
> > -               break;
> > -       case 1:
> > -               da850_max_speed = 372000;
> > -               break;
> > -       }
> > +       da850_max_speed = 456000;
> >
> >         return da850_register_cpufreq("pll0_sysclk3");
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ