linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] svm/avic: Fix invalidate logical APIC id entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 03:47:31 +0000
From:   "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
CC:     "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] svm/avic: Fix invalidate logical APIC id entry



On 3/22/19 8:04 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> writes:
> 
>> Only clear the valid bit when invalidate logical APIC id entry.
>> The current logic clear the valid bit, but also set the rest of
>> the bits (including reserved bits) to 1.
>>
>> Fixes: 98d90582be2e ('svm: Fix AVIC DFR and LDR handling')
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 7a4ce1a22ca0..f4fb766e474c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -4640,7 +4640,7 @@ static void avic_invalidate_logical_id_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   	u32 *entry = avic_get_logical_id_entry(vcpu, svm->ldr_reg, flat);
>>   
>>   	if (entry)
>> -		WRITE_ONCE(*entry, (u32) ~AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK);
>> +		WRITE_ONCE(*entry, (u32)(*entry & ~AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK));
> 
> I'm not sure how important this is, but this change creates a tiny time
> window between reading from *entry and writing there. Should we use
> atomic bitops instead?

Sure. That is also simpler. I'll send out V2 w/ clear_bit() instead.

Suravee

> 
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int avic_handle_ldr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>