[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190326195912.43316-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:59:12 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, shenghui <shhuiw@...mail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Zap lock classes even with lock debugging disabled
Commit a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer
in use") changed the behavior of lockdep_free_key_range() from
unconditionally zapping lock classes into only zapping lock classes if
debug_lock == true. Since the new behavior can cause cat /proc/lockdep to
crash due to a NULL pointer dereference, restore the pre-v5.1 behavior.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: shenghui <shhuiw@...mail.com>
Reported-by: shenghui <shhuiw@...mail.com>
Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") # v5.1-rc1.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 34cdcbedda49..70480e4f8f5d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4689,8 +4689,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
return;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
- if (!graph_lock())
- goto out_irq;
+ arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
/* closed head */
pf = delayed_free.pf + (delayed_free.index ^ 1);
@@ -4702,8 +4701,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
*/
call_rcu_zapped(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index);
- graph_unlock();
-out_irq:
+ arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -4744,21 +4742,15 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_reg(void *start, unsigned long size)
{
struct pending_free *pf;
unsigned long flags;
- int locked;
init_data_structures_once();
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
- locked = graph_lock();
- if (!locked)
- goto out_irq;
-
+ arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
pf = get_pending_free();
__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, start, size);
call_rcu_zapped(pf);
-
- graph_unlock();
-out_irq:
+ arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
@@ -4911,9 +4903,7 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
return;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
- if (!graph_lock())
- goto out_irq;
-
+ arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
pf = get_pending_free();
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) {
if (k == key) {
@@ -4925,8 +4915,7 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!found);
__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
call_rcu_zapped(pf);
- graph_unlock();
-out_irq:
+ arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */
--
2.21.0.196.g041f5ea1cf98
Powered by blists - more mailing lists