[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB30862D49744CFC6FEAD78177CB5F0@MN2PR18MB3086.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:09:18 +0000
From: Yuri Norov <ynorov@...vell.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] bitmap_parselist: rework input string parser
+ Mike Travis <travis@....com>
+ Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:07:45AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>> The requirement for this rework is to keep the __bitmap_parselist()
>> copy-less and single-pass but make it more readable and maintainable by
>> splitting into logical parts and removing explicit nested cycles and
>> opaque local variables.
>>
>> __bitmap_parselist() can parse userspace inputs and therefore we cannot
>> use simple_strtoul() to parse numbers.
> So, all above depends to what memory we access kernel / user space.
> Perhaps we can get copy of memory of a given size and then parse it in kernel space always?
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
What I missed during rework is that we have only one caller of *parselist_userĀ -
it's write_irq_affinity() introduced by Mike Travis in kernel/irq/proc.c. It doesn't look
like a hot path as it's file operations handler. If no objections from Mike or Thomas,
I think it would make sense to copy_from_user() the userspace data at the beginning
in sake of simplicity of __bitmap_parselist(), as you suggested above.
Yury
Powered by blists - more mailing lists