linux-kernel - Re: Reading `/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak` takes 3 s and content not shown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:17:01 +0100
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reading `/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak` takes 3 s and content not
 shown

Dear Christophe,


On 26.03.19 13:55, Christophe Leroy wrote:

> Le 26/03/2019 à 13:49, Paul Menzel a écrit :

>> On 19.02.19 10:44, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>
>>> On a the IBM S822LC (8335-GTA) with Ubuntu 18.10, and Linux 5.0-rc5+
>>> accessing `/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak` takes a long time. According to
>>> strace it takes three seconds.
>>>
>>> $ dmesg | grep leak
>>> [    4.407957] kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector initialized
>>> [    4.407959] kmemleak: Automatic memory scanning thread started
>>> [745989.625624] kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see 
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
>>> [1002619.951902] kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see 
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the leaks supposedly stored in that file are not shown
>>> either.
>>
>> The problem is still present with Linux 5.0. Do you have an idea, how 
>> to fix this?
> 
> Have you identified a previous version that works properly?

It seems to have worked with Linux 4.18-rc4+ [1].

> If so, have you been able to bisect the problem?

No, sorry, I have not. I do not have resources for this.


Kind regards,

Paul


[1]: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2018-July/175658.html