[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190327135308.GG5345@kunai>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:53:08 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefan Lengfeld <contact@...fanchrist.eu>,
Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] i2c: core: introduce atomic transfers
> >> the demux-pinctrl driver... BTW, that driver should forward ->smbus_xfer
> >> just like it does for ->master_xfer, no?
> >
> > Yes. The idea of having two seperate SMBus controllers in one SoC which
> > would need demuxing is amusing, but still, it exists for I2C and you are
> > right.
>
> Right, I didn't actually think all that far... :-)
On second thought, we can add smbus support when we need it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists