linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 039/146] btrfs: remove WARN_ON in log_dir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190401170051.801904900@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Apr 2019 19:00:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 039/146] btrfs: remove WARN_ON in log_dir_items

5.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>

commit 2cc8334270e281815c3850c3adea363c51f21e0d upstream.

When Filipe added the recursive directory logging stuff in
2f2ff0ee5e430 ("Btrfs: fix metadata inconsistencies after directory
fsync") he specifically didn't take the directory i_mutex for the
children directories that we need to log because of lockdep.  This is
generally fine, but can lead to this WARN_ON() tripping if we happen to
run delayed deletion's in between our first search and our second search
of dir_item/dir_indexes for this directory.  We expect this to happen,
so the WARN_ON() isn't necessary.  Drop the WARN_ON() and add a comment
so we know why this case can happen.

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |   11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -3517,9 +3517,16 @@ static noinline int log_dir_items(struct
 	}
 	btrfs_release_path(path);
 
-	/* find the first key from this transaction again */
+	/*
+	 * Find the first key from this transaction again.  See the note for
+	 * log_new_dir_dentries, if we're logging a directory recursively we
+	 * won't be holding its i_mutex, which means we can modify the directory
+	 * while we're logging it.  If we remove an entry between our first
+	 * search and this search we'll not find the key again and can just
+	 * bail.
+	 */
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &min_key, path, 0, 0);
-	if (WARN_ON(ret != 0))
+	if (ret != 0)
 		goto done;
 
 	/*