linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 028/146] vxlan: Dont call gro_cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  1 Apr 2019 19:00:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "Suanming.Mou" <mousuanming@...wei.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 028/146] vxlan: Dont call gro_cells_destroy() before device is unregistered

5.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit cc4807bb609230d8959fd732b0bf3bd4c2de8eac ]

Commit ad6c9986bcb62 ("vxlan: Fix GRO cells race condition between
receive and link delete") fixed a race condition for the typical case a vxlan
device is dismantled from the current netns. But if a netns is dismantled,
vxlan_destroy_tunnels() is called to schedule a unregister_netdevice_queue()
of all the vxlan tunnels that are related to this netns.

In vxlan_destroy_tunnels(), gro_cells_destroy() is called and finished before
unregister_netdevice_queue(). This means that the gro_cells_destroy() call is
done too soon, for the same reasons explained in above commit.

So we need to fully respect the RCU rules, and thus must remove the
gro_cells_destroy() call or risk use after-free.

Fixes: 58ce31cca1ff ("vxlan: GRO support at tunnel layer")
Signed-off-by: Suanming.Mou <mousuanming@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -4184,10 +4184,8 @@ static void vxlan_destroy_tunnels(struct
 		/* If vxlan->dev is in the same netns, it has already been added
 		 * to the list by the previous loop.
 		 */
-		if (!net_eq(dev_net(vxlan->dev), net)) {
-			gro_cells_destroy(&vxlan->gro_cells);
+		if (!net_eq(dev_net(vxlan->dev), net))
 			unregister_netdevice_queue(vxlan->dev, head);
-		}
 	}

 	for (h = 0; h < PORT_HASH_SIZE; ++h)