[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB339817E7F593A70D3F9D3D7AC2550@BYAPR12MB3398.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:40:36 +0000
From: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Krishna Yarlagadda" <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 18/26] spi: tegra114: add support for hw based cs
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:56:39PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> > Tegra SPI driver default uses SW CS control for transfers and HW CS
> > control can be enabled through SPI client device node DT property
> > nvidia,enable-hw-based-cs and is used only for single transfers.
>
> Why have a property - if this feature works and is useful why would a system ever not want to use it?
> > + single_xfer = list_is_singular(&msg->transfers);
> > list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
> > u32 cmd1;
> >
> > reinit_completion(&tspi->xfer_completion);
> >
> > - cmd1 = tegra_spi_setup_transfer_one(spi, xfer, is_first_msg);
> > + cmd1 = tegra_spi_setup_transfer_one(spi, xfer, is_first_msg,
> > + single_xfer);
>
> It's not sufficient to check if there's only one transfer, you also need to make sure that the driver isn't using cs_change to use non-standard chip select handling.
Yes we can avoid DT and force to use HW CS incase of all single transfers without cs_change. Will update in next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists