[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401194558.zdcr3m3imd6vpze6@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:45:59 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: isch: Remove unnecessary acpi.h include
> > > Jean, would you like me to repost this with the updates? I assume you
> > > will merge this (just based on get_maintainer.pl)?
> >
> > I will apply it, now that it has Jean's Rev-by. I assume this is
> > for-next material despite the Fixes tag?
>
> Definitely for-next material, not for the current release. Jean
> suggested the Fixes tag, I think since it's related to a specific
> commit and could be backported together with that commit.
Makes sense.
> Should there be a MAINTAINERS update to clarify who applies patches to
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-isch.c? Right now, get_maintainers.pl doesn't
> mention you (Wolfram).
I have set the i2c/busses directory to 'Odd Fixes' in MAINTAINERS. I
don't want to be mentioned for specific drivers. I am eagerly looking
for driver maintainers to spread reponsibility. Maybe my tree could be
added to Jean's maintainer entry, but not sure what that is worth...
> Patch with tags attached in case it's useful to you (sorry, I'm
> saddled with gmail right now and can't include it inline).
No worries. Patchwork keeps it all for me.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists