[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401193931.GA1135@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:39:31 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
net/rxrpc/local_object.c: In function ‘rxrpc_open_socket’:
net/rxrpc/local_object.c:175:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (ret < 0) {
^
net/rxrpc/local_object.c:184:2: note: here
case AF_INET:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Currently, GCC is expecting to find the fall-through annotations
at the very bottom of the case and on its own line. That's why
I had to add the annotation, although the intentional fall-through
is already mentioned in a few lines above.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
net/rxrpc/local_object.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
index 15cf42d5b53a..9157fd00dce3 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/local_object.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int rxrpc_open_socket(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct net *net)
/* Fall through and set IPv4 options too otherwise we don't get
* errors from IPv4 packets sent through the IPv6 socket.
*/
-
+ /* Fall through */
case AF_INET:
/* we want to receive ICMP errors */
opt = 1;
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists