[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904010931480.2476@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/14] x86/exceptions: Make IST index zero based
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 11:40:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> > @@ -25,11 +25,14 @@
> > #define IRQ_STACK_ORDER (2 + KASAN_STACK_ORDER)
> > #define IRQ_STACK_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE << IRQ_STACK_ORDER)
> >
> > -#define DOUBLEFAULT_STACK 1
> > -#define NMI_STACK 2
> > -#define DEBUG_STACK 3
> > -#define MCE_STACK 4
> > -#define N_EXCEPTION_STACKS 4 /* hw limit: 7 */
> > +/*
> > + * The index for the tss.ist[] array. The hardware limit is 7 entries.
> > + */
> > +#define DOUBLEFAULT_IST 0
> > +#define NMI_IST 1
> > +#define DEBUG_IST 2
> > +#define MCE_IST 3
> > +#define N_EXCEPTION_STACKS 4
>
> Would it make sense to use an enum here?
Yes, but ASM code hates enums. We could solve that by moving it to a
different header and exposing the necessary define via asm-offsets. I'll
have a look.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists