[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401073352.GB28264@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:33:52 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/kvm: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has()
callers to boot_cpu_has()
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:24:06AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The MSR reads and writes are not done in the common case. Also, you
> cannot really expect boot_cpu_data to be in L1 in these functions since
> they run after the guest---or if they do, each L1 line you fill in with
> host data is one line you "steal" from the guest.
Ok, fair enough. I'll drop this patch.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists