linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190401102732.GD4187@dell>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:32:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > on i386 or x86_64:
> > 
> > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SUN6I_PRCM
> >   Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ARCH_SUNXI
> >   Selected by [y]:
> >   - CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN8I [=y] && COMMON_CLK [=y] && CLK_SUNXI [=y]
> 
> I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the
> sunxi tree).  Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been
> applied yet.

Where is the fix to be applied?  SUNXI or MFD?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog