linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 22:36:24 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)

Hi Lee,

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the
> > sunxi tree).  Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been
> > applied yet.  
> 
> Where is the fix to be applied?  SUNXI or MFD?

Well, I only see the problem after applying the sunxi tree (which
happens before I merge the mfd tree).

Maxime said:

> I've just sent a patch fixing this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190322091650.5189-1-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com/

So maybe if you (Lee) acked it, Maxime could apply it to the sunxi
tree, so we keep the breakage and fix together?  Assuming that the fix
is acceptable (and works :-)).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped