[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401123337.2nhppxyl5nzyofub@flea>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:33:37 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the
> > > sunxi tree). Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been
> > > applied yet.
> >
> > Where is the fix to be applied? SUNXI or MFD?
>
> Well, I only see the problem after applying the sunxi tree (which
> happens before I merge the mfd tree).
>
> Maxime said:
>
> > I've just sent a patch fixing this:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190322091650.5189-1-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com/
>
> So maybe if you (Lee) acked it, Maxime could apply it to the sunxi
> tree, so we keep the breakage and fix together? Assuming that the fix
> is acceptable (and works :-)).
That works for me
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists