[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190403100204.GL11301@dell>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:02:04 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd)
On Mon, 01 Apr 2019, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the
> > > > sunxi tree). Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been
> > > > applied yet.
> > >
> > > Where is the fix to be applied? SUNXI or MFD?
> >
> > Well, I only see the problem after applying the sunxi tree (which
> > happens before I merge the mfd tree).
> >
> > Maxime said:
> >
> > > I've just sent a patch fixing this:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190322091650.5189-1-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com/
> >
> > So maybe if you (Lee) acked it, Maxime could apply it to the sunxi
> > tree, so we keep the breakage and fix together? Assuming that the fix
> > is acceptable (and works :-)).
>
> That works for me
That patch has been applied in my -fixes branch, so should be repaired
before it breaks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists