linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKGbVbsn9BpbMZCshxzj=d38wHpBhBo7wrZDQnC01hB30B9-mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:59:37 +0800
From:   Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
To:     Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Thanks, patch is:
> > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
>
> Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda
> confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't say whether/when/how
> it gets merged. Big chance the patch will get lost in limbo and fall
> through cracks.

Thanks for the remind, this patch should only be applied to drm-misc-next
branch when 5.1-rcx branch gets merged to drm-misc-next for the new
xa_alloc API. So I expect the guy who do the 5.1-rcx merge should apply
this patch. Who will do the merge?

Regards,
Qiang

>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Qiang
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:50 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:7,
> > >                  from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
> > >                  from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:83,
> > >                  from include/linux/bug.h:5,
> > >                  from include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
> > >                  from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
> > >                  from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> > >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:4:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c: In function 'lima_ctx_create':
> > > include/linux/limits.h:13:18: warning: passing argument 3 of 'xa_alloc' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > >  #define UINT_MAX (~0U)
> > >                   ^~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:26:36: note: in expansion of macro 'UINT_MAX'
> > >   err = xa_alloc(&mgr->handles, id, UINT_MAX, ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >                                     ^~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from include/linux/radix-tree.h:31,
> > >                  from include/linux/idr.h:15,
> > >                  from include/drm/drm_device.h:7,
> > >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_device.h:7,
> > >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:6:
> > > include/linux/xarray.h:817:9: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int'
> > >    void *entry, struct xa_limit limit, gfp_t gfp)
> > >    ~~~~~~^~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:26:46: error: incompatible type for argument 4 of 'xa_alloc'
> > >   err = xa_alloc(&mgr->handles, id, UINT_MAX, ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >                                               ^~~
> > > In file included from include/linux/radix-tree.h:31,
> > >                  from include/linux/idr.h:15,
> > >                  from include/drm/drm_device.h:7,
> > >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_device.h:7,
> > >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:6:
> > > include/linux/xarray.h:817:32: note: expected 'struct xa_limit' but argument is of type 'struct lima_ctx *'
> > >    void *entry, struct xa_limit limit, gfp_t gfp)
> > >                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   a1d2a6339961 ("drm/lima: driver for ARM Mali4xx GPUs")
> > >
> > > interacting with commit
> > >
> > >   a3e4d3f97ec8 ("XArray: Redesign xa_alloc API")
> > >
> > > from Linus' tree (v5.1-rc1).
> > >
> > > I have applied the following patch for today.  It could be applied as
> > > part of a merge of v5.1-rc1 into drm-misc.
> > >
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:45:32 +1100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/lima: update for xa_alloc API change
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c
> > > index c8d12f7c6894..bafa00d74cc5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c
> > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int lima_ctx_create(struct lima_device *dev, struct lima_ctx_mgr *mgr, u32 *id)
> > >                         goto err_out0;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       err = xa_alloc(&mgr->handles, id, UINT_MAX, ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +       err = xa_alloc(&mgr->handles, id, ctx, XA_LIMIT(*id, UINT_MAX), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >         if (err < 0)
> > >                 goto err_out0;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch