[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3d975a7a8e378c5a831d7ae6a98da1af9557c05.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 02:00:06 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Anshul Garg <aksgarg1989@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 034/131] lib/int_sqrt: optimize small argument
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 08:59 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:42:52AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 19:01 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > If this is to be ported just for an optimization
> > (which I think is dubious as it's not a bug fix),
>
> Yes, it was requested to be backported because of that.
>
> > why not port the __fls optimization too?
> >
> > __fls has a bigger effect on performance.
>
> What commit are you referring to?
f8ae107eef209bff29a5816bc1aad40d5cd69a80
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists