[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:23:34 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pavel@....cz>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] leds: lm3532: Introduce the lm3532 LED driver
Tony
On 4/4/19 1:48 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On 4/4/19 2:09 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com> [190321 14:29]:
>>> Introduce the Texas Instruments LM3532 White LED driver.
>>> The driver supports ALS configurability or manual brightness
>>> control.
>>>
>>> The driver also supports associating LED strings with specific
>>> control banks in a group or as individually controlled strings.
>>
>> I'm seeing slightly different naming under /sys/class/leds:
>>
>> lm3532:backlight
>> lm3532:platform::kbd_backlight
>
> The problem is in the "platform:" being a part of DT
> label property. It should not be included there if devicename
> section is added in the driver.
>
Feel free to make it whatever you want I am not married to the naming convention for Droid 4.
It was a suggestion in the code review
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1048806/
<snip>
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists