[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 22:12:03 +0200
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, tony@...mide.com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pavel@....cz, lee.jones@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Update backlight dt
properties
Tony,
On 3/21/19 3:28 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Update the properties for the lm3532 device node for droid4.
> With this change the backlight LED string and the keypad
> LED strings will be controlled separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> ---
>
> v5 - No change - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1050409/
>
> v4 - No change - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1050125/
> v3 - updated keypad label on v1 comment - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1049023/
> v2 - Fixed ramp-up and ramp-down properties, removed hard coded property values,
> I did not change the label as it is undecided what it could be - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1048806/
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts | 26 ++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts
> index e21ec929f096..aea206f04f76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-droid4-xt894.dts
> @@ -383,20 +383,30 @@
> };
>
> &i2c1 {
> - lm3532@38 {
> + led-controller@38 {
> compatible = "ti,lm3532";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0x38>;
>
> enable-gpios = <&gpio6 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> - lcd_backlight: backlight {
> - compatible = "ti,lm3532-backlight";
> + ramp-up-us = <1024>;
> + ramp-down-us = <8193>;
>
> - lcd {
> - led-sources = <0 1 2>;
> - ramp-up-msec = <1>;
> - ramp-down-msec = <0>;
> - };
Since I'll be creating integration branch for this series,
and it would be good to have this patch in it too, then
I can do the amendments by myself:
> + lcd_backlight: led@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + led-sources = <2>;
> + ti,led-mode = <0>;
> + label = "backlight";
s/backlight/:backlight/
> + linux,default-trigger = "backlight";
> + };
> +
> + led@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + led-sources = <1>;
> + ti,led-mode = <0>;
> + label = "platform::kbd_backlight";
s/platform::kbd_backlight/:kbd_backlight/
and then send you a pull request.
Would you be OK with that?
> };
> };
> };
>
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists