[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190405100749.56bf86a2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:07:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] sycalls: Remove args i and n from
syscall_get_arguments()
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:24:16 -1000
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> I assume you've actually used this and can trace system calls with
> arguments properly, so that it's all tested at least on x86-64?
>
Yep, and even tested it against strace. Looks fine. I also ran it
through my entire ftrace test suite (takes around 10 hours or more),
and it all passed.
I'll collect the last bit of acks and then send you a pull request.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists