linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Use normal rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190405144218.gvfft6aw36ciogfi@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:42:18 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Use normal rcu

On 2019-03-22 18:59:23 [+0100], To Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 2019-03-22 10:43:34 [-0700], Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
Hi,

> > We can switch but it doesn't really say why we'd want to.  Can you
> > please explain why this is better?
> 
> there is this undocumented part. Avoiding the sched RCU means also we
> are more preemptible which is good :) Especially on -RT where we can't
> disable preemption across the whole critical section.
> 
> Is this good enough?

a gentle ping.

> > Thanks.
> 
Sebastian