[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqGfSS0PHaM+QcEMzhxXN5F9vQEE=nWseSoRKbrEmkFHag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:04:49 -0700
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] thermal: qoriq: Pass data to qoriq_tmu_calibration()
directly
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:12 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2019 06:14, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > We can simplify error cleanup code if instead of passing a "struct
> > platform_device *" to qoriq_tmu_calibration() and deriving a bunch of
> > pointers from it, we pass those pointers directly. This way we won't
> > be force to call platform_set_drvdata() as early in qoriq_tmu_probe()
> > and consequently would be able to drop the "err_iomap" error path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> > Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
> > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Angus Ainslie (Purism) <angus@...ea.ca>
> > Cc: linux-imx@....com
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > index 24a2a57f61c9..a3ddb55740e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> > @@ -139,16 +139,16 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct device *dev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct device *dev,
> > + struct qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> > {
> > int i, val, len;
> > u32 range[4];
> > const u32 *calibration;
> > - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> >
> > if (of_property_read_u32_array(np, "fsl,tmu-range", range, 4)) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing calibration range.\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing calibration range.\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > calibration = of_get_property(np, "fsl,tmu-calibration", &len);
> > if (calibration == NULL || len % 8) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid calibration data.\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "invalid calibration data.\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -198,20 +198,17 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!data)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> > -
> > data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> >
> > data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > if (!data->regs) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> > - ret = -ENODEV;
> > - goto err_iomap;
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > qoriq_tmu_init_device(data); /* TMU initialization */
> >
> > - ret = qoriq_tmu_calibration(pdev); /* TMU calibration */
> > + ret = qoriq_tmu_calibration(dev, data); /* TMU calibration */
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto err_tmu;
> >
> > @@ -222,14 +219,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err_iomap;
>
> s/goto err_iomap/goto err_tmu/ ?
>
Ugh, not sure how I missed this. Will fix. Thanks for catching this!
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists