[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1554489537.1199.0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 21:38:57 +0300
From: "Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@...il.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Christoph Müllner
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX
offload for rockchip devices
> What's your overall setup? So far with my RK3328 box I've found that
> with an IPv4 link and an MTU of 2000 I have to dial PBL right down to
> 1 or 2 (with no-pbl-x8 as well) to prevent Tx stalling, and with the
> MTU bumped up to 3000 it just won't play at any PBL setting...
>
> Robin.
I'm using a Libre Computer Renegade with RK3328 SoC(maybe it's a board
specific thing?)
I'm using txpbl as from what I can gather, the rx has no issues, no
need to change it.
When it comes to rx,
running the server (iperf3 -s) on the Renegade and iperf3 -c
<renegade_ip> on my laptop,
I get about 940 Mbps. It's always been like that, satisfactory.
When it comes to tx (the one all the fuss is about)
I eventually find that just with snps,txpbl = <0x21>, and no other pbl
thing set I get about 905 Mbps on average sent to my laptop, now
running the iperf3 server.
I must say I haven't touched the MTUs but I never needed to as the
issue presented itself in normal usage. Simple iperf tests will fail
after same kilobytes if no tweaks are applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists