linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-tip v2 00/12] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:27:37 -1000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v2 00/12] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:22 AM Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>  v2:
>   - Move the negative reader count checking patch (patch 12->10)
>     forward to before the merge owner to count patch as suggested by
>     Linus & expand the comment.

All looks good to me now.

I didn't apply and _test_ any of the patches, but they look sane and
the numbers you quote are compelling.

So ack as far as I'm concerned,

                   Linus