[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410100054.GA115532@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:00:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v2 00/12] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2
* Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> # of Threads Before Patch After Patch
> ------------ ------------ -----------
> 2 1,179 9,436
> 4 1,505 8,268
> 8 721 7,041
> 16 575 7,652
> 32 70 2,189
> 64 39 534
>
> Waiman Long (12):
> locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme
> locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation
> locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem_wake() wakeup optimization
> locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return owner state
> locking/rwsem: Ensure an RT task will not spin on reader
> locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers in wait queue
> locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer
> locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem
> locking/rwsem: Add more rwsem owner access helpers
> locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negative
> locking/rwsem: Merge owner into count on x86-64
> locking/rwsem: Remove redundant computation of writer lock word
>
> kernel/locking/lock_events_list.h | 4 +
> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 635 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 3 +-
> kernel/locking/rwsem.h | 290 +++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 647 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-)
Looks very nice!
With both sets of patches applied they pass all x86 tests, but there's
cross-build failures on powerpc32, sparc32 and UML:
kernel/locking/rwsem.h:333:34: error: 'struct rw_semaphore' has no member named 'owner'
Could you please send a delta patch against tip:WIP.locking/core, which
is the work-in-progress tree? I'll backmerge the delta patch (and any
other updates you might have meanwhil) to the one that introduces the
breakage.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists