[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5c1fb9c-16ec-420c-4067-53d6bccb4ebd@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:13:32 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>,
lennart@...ttering.net, mkoutny@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames
On 4/8/19 9:08 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:05:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I did consider that, and that would be doable. But honestly, I'm having a
>> hard time seeing what issue we are attempting to fix by doing this.
>
> Yeah, I guess the real fix would be to update the documentation and the
> expectations user-space has. Including eventual re-write of some udev rules or
> whatever is facing these files. But to me that sounds more like a systemd or
> even distro thing than a kernel thing.
I agree. Trying to force someones hand by renaming isn't going to fix
anything, but it will potentially cause issues.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists