[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5283A08F-FD6F-4A9C-841D-B49CE9B4CF1F@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:14:42 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>,
lennart@...ttering.net, mkoutny@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames
> Il giorno 8 apr 2019, alle ore 17:08, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de> ha scritto:
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:05:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I did consider that, and that would be doable. But honestly, I'm having a
>> hard time seeing what issue we are attempting to fix by doing this.
>
> Yeah, I guess the real fix would be to update the documentation and the
> expectations user-space has. Including eventual re-write of some udev rules or
> whatever is facing these files. But to me that sounds more like a systemd or
> even distro thing than a kernel thing.
>
Unfortunately the user-space people I have interacted with find crazy
to have to change their software to call bfq.weight the weight of a
group. And are not willing to do it [1].
Thanks,
Paolo
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7057
> Byte,
> Johannes
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
> jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists