linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_audmix: remove "model" attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEnQRZB8ub6tyuputU51Ev9d6USg4idcXW6P6tkfuhHECAuGUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:05:31 +0300
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:     Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_audmix: remove "model" attribute

Hi Viorel,

Few comments inline.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:36 AM Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com> wrote:
>
> Use "of_device_id.data" to specify the machine driver,
> instead of "model" DTS attribute.

<snip>

>  static int fsl_audmix_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;

You might want to remove this change from the patch because it touches
a lot of lines
and it makes the review harder.

I don't see any reason to have it at all.

thanks,
Daniel.