lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409135924.GA11431@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:59:24 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: per-device dma_map_ops for intel-iommu?

Hi David and Joerg,

do you remember a good reason why intel-iommu is not using per-device
dma_map_ops like the AMD iommu or the various ARM iommus?

Right now intel-iommu.c contains a half-asses reimplementation of the
dma direct code for the iommu_no_mapping() case, and it would seem
much nicer to just fall back to that case and not even call into
intel-iommu in that case.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ