[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLaZ3czP9YDJ9R+3UeBxuULubBPcnFNdh+qT_S9D5eZZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:29:43 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: pn533: mark expected switch fall-throughs
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:57 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c: In function ‘pn533_transceive’:
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2142:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (dev->tgt_active_prot == NFC_PROTO_FELICA) {
> ^
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2150:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c: In function ‘pn533_wq_mi_recv’:
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2267:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (dev->tgt_active_prot == NFC_PROTO_FELICA) {
> ^
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2276:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1230487 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1230488 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists