[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409030231.GA14861@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:02:31 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Implement ASID allocator
Hi Anup,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 06:32:36AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> This patch is tested on QEMU/virt machine and SiFive Unleashed board.
> On QEMU/virt machine, we see 10% (approx) performance improvement with
> SW emulated TLBs provided by QEMU. Unfortunately, ASID bits of SATP CSR
> are not implemented on SiFive Unleashed board so we don't see any change
> in performance.
Can you tell me what is the test case ?
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists