[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409172520.GE14679@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:25:20 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] dma-iommu: refactor iommu_dma_mmap
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 27/03/2019 08:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Move the vm_area handling into __iommu_dma_mmap, which is renamed
>> to iommu_dma_mmap_remap.
>>
>> Inline __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn into the main function to simplify the code
>> flow a bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> index d14fe9f8c692..43bd3c7e0f6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> @@ -597,23 +597,27 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>> }
>> /**
>> - * __iommu_dma_mmap - Map a buffer into provided user VMA
>> - * @pages: Array representing buffer from __iommu_dma_alloc()
>> + * iommu_dma_mmap_remap - Map a remapped page array into provided user VMA
>> + * @cpu_addr: virtual address of the memory to be remapped
>> * @size: Size of buffer in bytes
>> * @vma: VMA describing requested userspace mapping
>> *
>> - * Maps the pages of the buffer in @pages into @vma. The caller is responsible
>> + * Maps the pages pointed to by @cpu_addr into @vma. The caller is responsible
>> * for verifying the correct size and protection of @vma beforehand.
>> */
>> -static int __iommu_dma_mmap(struct page **pages, size_t size,
>> +static int iommu_dma_mmap_remap(void *cpu_addr, size_t size,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> {
>> + struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr);
>> unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
>> unsigned int i, count = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> int ret = -ENXIO;
>> + if (WARN_ON(!area || !area->pages))
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> for (i = vma->vm_pgoff; i < count && uaddr < vma->vm_end; i++) {
>> - ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[i]);
>> + ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, area->pages[i]);
>> if (ret)
>> break;
>> uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
>> @@ -1052,21 +1056,13 @@ static void iommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>> }
>> }
>> -static int __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> - unsigned long pfn, size_t size)
>> -{
>> - return remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn + vma->vm_pgoff,
>> - vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
>> - vma->vm_page_prot);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int iommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
>> unsigned long attrs)
>> {
>> unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff;
>> - struct vm_struct *area;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> int ret;
>> vma->vm_page_prot = arch_dma_mmap_pgprot(dev, vma->vm_page_prot,
>> attrs);
>> @@ -1077,25 +1073,15 @@ static int iommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> if (off >= nr_pages || vma_pages(vma) > nr_pages - off)
>> return -ENXIO;
>> - if (!is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) {
>> - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr));
>> - return __iommu_dma_mmap_pfn(vma, pfn, size);
>> - }
>> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) {
>> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS))
>> + return iommu_dma_mmap_remap(cpu_addr, size, vma);
>> + pfn = vmalloc_to_pfn(cpu_addr);
>> + } else
>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(virt_to_page(cpu_addr));
>
> Nit: braces around the else clause for correct style.
So I generally prefer that style too. But in this case one of the
later patches will add an ifdef around the if { ... } else, and
adding braces would make that a lot more awkware. There is another
occurance or two of this patter in this series elsewhere as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists