[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190409200649.GD19840@eros.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:49 +1000
From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] slob: Respect list_head abstraction layer
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:59:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 4/3/19 11:13 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
>
> > According to 0day test robot this is triggering an error from
> > CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION when the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST.
>
> FWIW, that report [1] was for commit 15c8410c67adef from next-20190401. I've
> checked and it's still the v4 version, although the report came after you
> submitted v5 (it wasn't testing the patches from mailing list, but mmotm). I
> don't see any report for the v5 version so I'd expect it to be indeed fixed by
> the new approach that adds boolean return parameter to slob_page_alloc().
>
> Vlastimil
Oh man thanks! That is super cool, thanks for letting me know
Vlastimil.
Tobin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists