[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190409152532.7f3a8168de2ec49aec152bd6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:25:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] slob: Respect list_head abstraction layer
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:06:49 +1000 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:59:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 4/3/19 11:13 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> >
> > > According to 0day test robot this is triggering an error from
> > > CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION when the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST.
> >
> > FWIW, that report [1] was for commit 15c8410c67adef from next-20190401. I've
> > checked and it's still the v4 version, although the report came after you
> > submitted v5 (it wasn't testing the patches from mailing list, but mmotm). I
> > don't see any report for the v5 version so I'd expect it to be indeed fixed by
> > the new approach that adds boolean return parameter to slob_page_alloc().
> >
> > Vlastimil
>
> Oh man thanks! That is super cool, thanks for letting me know
> Vlastimil.
Yes, thanks for the followup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists