[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f843024e-5f06-a566-7ab4-5c3e03e6ed3f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:32:07 -0500
From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: dinguyen@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings
Hi Boris,
On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future
>> patches will follow this format.
>
> You know how that works - I need ACKs.
>
I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring
which was sufficient in the past.
Here are the links to the original ACKs and Reviewed-by.
Patch 1: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/737155/
Patch 2: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757205/
Patch 3: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757207/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists