linux-kernel - [PATCH] bitops.h: sanitize rotate primitives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:19:06 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bitops.h: sanitize rotate primitives

The ror32 implementation (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift) has
undefined behaviour if shift is outside the [1, 31] range. Similarly
for the 64 bit variants. Most callers pass a compile-time
constant (naturally in that range), but there's an UBSAN report that
these may actually be called with a shift count of 0.

Instead of special-casing that, we can make them DTRT for all values
of shift while also avoiding UB. For some reason, this was already
partly done for rol32 (which was well-defined for [0, 31]). gcc 8
recognizes these patterns as rotates, so for example

__u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
{
	return (word << (shift & 31)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31));
}

compiles to

0000000000000020 <rol32>:
  20:   89 f8                   mov    %edi,%eax
  22:   89 f1                   mov    %esi,%ecx
  24:   d3 c0                   rol    %cl,%eax
  26:   c3                      retq

Older compilers unfortunately do not do as well, but this only affects
the small minority of users that don't pass constants.

Due to integer promotions, ro[lr]8 were already well-defined for
shifts in [0, 8], and ro[lr]16 were mostly well-defined for shifts in
[0, 16] (only mostly - u16 gets promoted to _signed_ int, so if bit 15
is set, word << 16 is undefined). For consistency, update those as
well.

Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
---
 include/linux/bitops.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index 602af23b98c7..cf074bce3eb3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long hweight_long(unsigned long w)
  */
 static inline __u64 rol64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word << shift) | (word >> (64 - shift));
+	return (word << (shift & 63)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 63));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static inline __u64 rol64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u64 ror64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word >> shift) | (word << (64 - shift));
+	return (word >> (shift & 63)) | (word << ((-shift) & 63));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline __u64 ror64(__u64 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word << shift) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31));
+	return (word << (shift & 31)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 31));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static inline __u32 rol32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word >> shift) | (word << (32 - shift));
+	return (word >> (shift & 31)) | (word << ((-shift) & 31));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static inline __u32 ror32(__u32 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u16 rol16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word << shift) | (word >> (16 - shift));
+	return (word << (shift & 15)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 15));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static inline __u16 rol16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u16 ror16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word >> shift) | (word << (16 - shift));
+	return (word >> (shift & 15)) | (word << ((-shift) & 15));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static inline __u16 ror16(__u16 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u8 rol8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word << shift) | (word >> (8 - shift));
+	return (word << (shift & 7)) | (word >> ((-shift) & 7));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static inline __u8 rol8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
  */
 static inline __u8 ror8(__u8 word, unsigned int shift)
 {
-	return (word >> shift) | (word << (8 - shift));
+	return (word >> (shift & 7)) | (word << ((-shift) & 7));
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.20.1