[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190410103644.131061192@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:00 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: [RFC patch 06/41] riscv/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX
marker
Terminating the last trace entry with ULONG_MAX is a completely pointless
exercise and none of the consumers can rely on it because it's
inconsistently implemented across architectures. In fact quite some of the
callers remove the entry and adjust stack_trace.nr_entries afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ static bool save_trace(unsigned long pc,
void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
{
walk_stackframe(tsk, NULL, save_trace, trace);
- if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
- trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists