[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190410103644.036077691@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:27:59 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
Subject: [RFC patch 05/41] unicore32/stacktrace: Remove the pointless
ULONG_MAX marker
Terminating the last trace entry with ULONG_MAX is a completely pointless
exercise and none of the consumers can rely on it because it's
inconsistently implemented across architectures. In fact quite some of the
callers remove the entry and adjust stack_trace.nr_entries afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
---
arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -120,8 +120,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
}
walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
- if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
- trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
}
void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists