lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190410103644.036077691@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:27:59 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
Subject: [RFC patch 05/41] unicore32/stacktrace: Remove the pointless
 ULONG_MAX marker

Terminating the last trace entry with ULONG_MAX is a completely pointless
exercise and none of the consumers can rely on it because it's
inconsistently implemented across architectures. In fact quite some of the
callers remove the entry and adjust stack_trace.nr_entries afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
---
 arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -120,8 +120,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
 	}
 
 	walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
-	if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
-		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 }
 
 void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ