lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:28:37 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf: use hweight64 instead of hweight_long

Em Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:10:42AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:08:41AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:16:43PM +0800, Mao Han escreveu:
> > > On 32-bits platform with more than 32 registers, the 64 bits mask is
> > > truncate to the lower 32 bits and the return value of hweight_long will
> > > always smaller than 32. When kernel outputs more than 32 registers, but
> > > the user perf program only counts 32, there will be a data mismatch
> > > result to overflow check fail.
> > > 
> > > CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > > CC: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> > > CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > > CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > > index 7835e05..73c78be 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > > @@ -2322,7 +2322,7 @@ int perf_evsel__parse_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
> > >  		if (data->user_regs.abi) {
> > >  			u64 mask = evsel->attr.sample_regs_user;
> > >  
> > > -			sz = hweight_long(mask) * sizeof(u64);
> > > +			sz = hweight64(mask) * sizeof(u64);
> > >  			OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
> > >  			data->user_regs.mask = mask;
> > >  			data->user_regs.regs = (u64 *)array;
> > 
> > Later on, in the same function, perf_evsel__parse_sample() we have:
> > 
> >         data->intr_regs.abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
> >         if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
> >                 OVERFLOW_CHECK_u64(array);
> >                 data->intr_regs.abi = *array;
> >                 array++;
> > 
> >                 if (data->intr_regs.abi != PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE) {
> >                         u64 mask = evsel->attr.sample_regs_intr;
> > 
> >                         sz = hweight_long(mask) * sizeof(u64);
> >                         OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
> >                         data->intr_regs.mask = mask;
> >                         data->intr_regs.regs = (u64 *)array;
> >                         array = (void *)array + sz;
> >                 }
> >         }
> > 
> > You forgot to convert that one, doing it for you,
> 
> Also in perf_event__sample_event_size() we need to do the same thing,
> right?

and perf_event__synthesize_sample()

Done, resulting patch is at the end of this messages, and matches the
kernel, that uses only hweight64().

I've also added Fixes tags to the patches that used hweight_long() in
various places, to help with the stable trees backporting process,
please consider doing it next time.

- Arnaldo

commit 21e6dfe04861c2c1b529f2759850bc62a80ca050
Author: Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 10 16:16:43 2019 +0800

    perf evsel: Use hweight64() instead of hweight_long(attr.sample_regs_user)
    
    On 32-bits platform with more than 32 registers, the 64 bits mask is
    truncate to the lower 32 bits and the return value of hweight_long will
    always smaller than 32. When kernel outputs more than 32 registers, but
    the user perf program only counts 32, there will be a data mismatch
    result to overflow check fail.
    
    Signed-off-by: Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
    Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
    Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
    Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
    Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
    Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
    Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
    Fixes: 6a21c0b5c2ab ("perf tools: Add core support for sampling intr machine state regs")
    Fixes: d03f2170546d ("perf tools: Expand perf_event__synthesize_sample()")
    Fixes: 0f6a30150ca2 ("perf tools: Support user regs and stack in sample parsing")
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/29ad7947dc8fd1ff0abd2093a72cc27a2446be9f.1554883878.git.han_mao@c-sky.com
    Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 66d066f18b5b..966360844fff 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ int perf_evsel__parse_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
 		if (data->user_regs.abi) {
 			u64 mask = evsel->attr.sample_regs_user;
 
-			sz = hweight_long(mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
 			data->user_regs.mask = mask;
 			data->user_regs.regs = (u64 *)array;
@@ -2424,7 +2424,7 @@ int perf_evsel__parse_sample(struct perf_evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
 		if (data->intr_regs.abi != PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE) {
 			u64 mask = evsel->attr.sample_regs_intr;
 
-			sz = hweight_long(mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
 			data->intr_regs.mask = mask;
 			data->intr_regs.regs = (u64 *)array;
@@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ size_t perf_event__sample_event_size(const struct perf_sample *sample, u64 type,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
 		if (sample->user_regs.abi) {
 			result += sizeof(u64);
-			sz = hweight_long(sample->user_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(sample->user_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			result += sz;
 		} else {
 			result += sizeof(u64);
@@ -2580,7 +2580,7 @@ size_t perf_event__sample_event_size(const struct perf_sample *sample, u64 type,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
 		if (sample->intr_regs.abi) {
 			result += sizeof(u64);
-			sz = hweight_long(sample->intr_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(sample->intr_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			result += sz;
 		} else {
 			result += sizeof(u64);
@@ -2710,7 +2710,7 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_sample(union perf_event *event, u64 type,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
 		if (sample->user_regs.abi) {
 			*array++ = sample->user_regs.abi;
-			sz = hweight_long(sample->user_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(sample->user_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			memcpy(array, sample->user_regs.regs, sz);
 			array = (void *)array + sz;
 		} else {
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_sample(union perf_event *event, u64 type,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
 		if (sample->intr_regs.abi) {
 			*array++ = sample->intr_regs.abi;
-			sz = hweight_long(sample->intr_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
+			sz = hweight64(sample->intr_regs.mask) * sizeof(u64);
 			memcpy(array, sample->intr_regs.regs, sz);
 			array = (void *)array + sz;
 		} else {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ