lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190410173142.dt5uldtgt4brhtjj@linux-r8p5> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:31:42 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v2 06/12] locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers in wait queue On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Bueso wrote: >On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Waiman Long wrote: >>2) I want to avoid the extreme case that there are more than 32k readers >>in the wait queue and make the count overflow. > >But in this case the readers are already on the queue. Never mind this. But the limit could still be enlarged just to prevent overflows in the case where there are only readers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists