lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:28:03 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        christian.koenig@....com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu: Bind process address spaces to devices

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:15:16PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/iommu.h |  70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 174 insertions(+)

Applied to the api-features branch for now, thanks Jean-Philippe!

'for now' because I have a question below.

> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index ed6738c358ca..87fe1cddd817 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -51,10 +51,13 @@ struct device;
>  struct iommu_domain;
>  struct notifier_block;
>  struct iommu_fault_event;
> +struct iommu_sva;

The iommu_fault_event doesn't yet exist in my tree, is this patch based
on something else I need besided Lu Baolus work? I got quite some
conflicts while applying the patch because of this.

> + * @sva_set_ops: Set ops for a SVA handle

I also removed this line.

Regards,

	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists