[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1904112100400.18787@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:04:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Joao Moreira <jmoreira@...e.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kbuild: Support for Symbols.list creation
> diff --git a/samples/livepatch/Makefile b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> index 2472ce39a18d..8b9b42a258ad 100644
> --- a/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/livepatch/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +LIVEPATCH_livepatch-sample := y
> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-sample.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-mod.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SAMPLE_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch-shadow-fix1.o
We discussed this and I think there has been no conclusion yet. Shouldn't
we do the same (add LIVEPATCH_) for the other samples here as well? So
they are not picked up by cmd_klp_map and their symbols stored in
Symbols.list?
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists